Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
A variety of Magnetite
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
Fe2+(Fe3+,V3+ )2O4
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
30076 (as Vanadium-bearing Magnetite)
2538 (as Magnetite)
2538 (as Magnetite)
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:30076:6 (as Vanadium-bearing Magnetite)
mindat:1:1:2538:2 (as Magnetite)
mindat:1:1:2538:2 (as Magnetite)
GUID
(UUID V4):
(UUID V4):
ec128a27-d6bf-4eaf-8cfb-65bef8c04e9e (as Vanadium-bearing Magnetite)
638fda79-4914-4fc0-9169-3c497a942ec8 (as Magnetite)
638fda79-4914-4fc0-9169-3c497a942ec8 (as Magnetite)
Chemistry of Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
Mindat Formula:
Fe2+(Fe3+,V3+ )2O4
Elements listed:
Synonyms of Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
Other Language Names for Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
Simplified Chinese:ιιη£ι
ε―ιη£ιηΏ
ε―ιη£ιηΏ
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Internet Links for Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-30076.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
Reference List:
Localities for Vanadium-bearing Magnetite
Locality List
- This locality has map coordinates listed.
- This locality has estimated coordinates.
β - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality.
Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.